数字农科院2.0

Development of Machine Learning Methods for Accurate Prediction of Plant Disease Resistance

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Liu, Qi;Zuo, Shi-min;Peng, Shasha;Zhang, Hao;Peng, Ye;Li, Wei;Xiong, Yehui;Lin, Runmao;Feng, Zhiming;Li, Huihui;Yang, Jun;Wang, Guo-Liang;Kang, Houxiang

作者机构：

关键词： Predicting plant disease resistance;Genomic selection;Machine learning;Genome-wide association study

期刊名称： ENGINEERING

ISSN： 2095-8099

年卷期： 2024 年 40 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCIE（2024版） ; ; EI（2024版） ; ; CSCD（2023-2024年度） ; ; 科技核心（2024版）

摘要： The traditional method of screening plants for disease resistance phenotype is both time-consuming and costly. Genomic selection offers a potential solution to improve efficiency, but accurately predicting plant disease resistance remains a challenge. In this study, we evaluated eight different machine learning (ML) methods, including random forest classification (RFC), support vector classifier (SVC), light gradient boosting machine (lightGBM), random forest classification plus kinship (RFC_K), support vector classification plus kinship (SVC_K), light gradient boosting machine plus kinship (lightGBM_K), deep neural network genomic prediction (DNNGP), and densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet), for predicting plant disease resistance. Our results demonstrate that the three plus kinship (K) methods developed in this study achieved high prediction accuracy. Specifically, these methods achieved accuracies of up to 95% for rice blast (RB), 85% for rice black-streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV), and 85% for rice sheath blight (RSB) when trained and applied to the rice diversity panel I (RDPI). Furthermore, the plus K models performed well in predicting wheat blast (WB) and wheat stripe rust (WSR) diseases, with mean accuracies of up to 90% and 93%, respectively. To assess the generalizability of our models, we applied the trained plus K methods to predict RB disease resistance in an independent population, rice diversity panel II (RDPII). Concurrently, we evaluated the RB resistance of RDPII cultivars using spray inoculation. Comparing the predictions with the spray inoculation results, we found that the accuracy of the plus K methods reached 91%. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the plus K methods (RFC_K, SVC_K, and lightGBM_K) in accurately predicting plant disease resistance for RB, RBSDV, RSB, WB, and WSR. The methods developed in this study not only provide valuable strategies for predicting disease resistance, but also pave the way for using machine learning to streamline genome-based crop breeding. (c) 2024 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

分类号：

  • 相关文献

[1]An interpretable integrated machine learning framework for genomic selection. Jinbu Wang,Jia Zhang,Wenjie Hao,Wencheng Zong,Mang Liang,Fuping Zhao,Longchao Zhang,Lixian Wang,Huijiang Gao,Ligang Wang. 2025

[2]Leveraging Automated Machine Learning for Environmental Data-Driven Genetic Analysis and Genomic Prediction in Maize Hybrids. He, Kunhui,Yu, Tingxi,Gao, Shang,Chen, Shoukun,Li, Liang,Zhang, Xuecai,Huang, Changling,Xu, Yunbi,Wang, Jiankang,Prasanna, Boddupalli M.,Hearne, Sarah,Li, Xinhai,Li, Huihui. 2025

[3]A plasticity-aware machine learning framework for genomic prediction and resource-efficient wheat breeding under multi-environment conditions. Lei Li,Cong Zhao,Huihui Li,Xi Tian,Jindong Liu,Duoxia Wang,Keyi Wang,Shuaipeng Fei,Guoliang Wan,Jianqi Zeng,Yachao Dong,Jixin Li,Yidan Jia,Yong Zhang,Xianchun Xia,Xin Ma,Yong He,Yonggui Xiao. 2026

[4]cis-Regulatory variation affecting gene expression contributes to the improvement of maize kernel size. Li Y.-X., Lu J., He C., Wu X., Cui Y., Chen L., Zhang J., Xie Y., An Y., Liu X., Zhen S., Liu Y., Li C., Zhang D., Shi Y.-S., Song Y., Wang J., Li Y., Wang G., Fu J., Wang T.. 2022

[5]Potential of marker selection to increase prediction accuracy of genomic selection in soybean (Glycine max L.). Li, Wenbin,Ma, Yansong,Liu, Zhangxiong,Guo, Yong,Qiu, Lijuan,Ma, Yansong,Luan, Xiaoyan,Reif, Jochen C.,Jiang, Yong,Wen, Zixiang,Wang, Dechun,Han, Tianfu,Wu, Cunxiang,Sun, Shi,Wei, Shuhong,Wang, Shuming,Yang, Chunming,Wang, Huicai,Yang, Chunming,Zhang, Mengchen,Lu, Weiguo,Xu, Ran,Zhou, Rong,Zhou, Xinan,Wang, Ruizhen,Sun, Zudong,Chen, Huaizhu,Zhang, Wanhai,Sun, Bincheng,Wu, Jian,Han, Dezhi,Yan, Hongrui,Hu, Guohua,Liu, Chunyan,Fu, Yashu,Chen, Weiyuan,Guo, Tai,Zhang, Lei,Yuan, Baojun.

[6]Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models. Guo, Gang,Zhao, Fuping,Du, Lixin,Guo, Gang,Guo, Gang,Wang, Yachun,Zhang, Yuan,Guo, Gang,Su, Guosheng. 2014

[7]Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels. Zhang, Z.,Ding, X.,Liu, J.,Zhang, Q.,Zhang, Z.,de Koning, D. -J.,Zhang, Z.,de Koning, D. -J.,de Koning, D. -J..

[8]Whole-genome strategies for marker-assisted plant breeding. Xu, Yunbi,Lu, Yanli,Gao, Shibin,Prasanna, Boddupalli M.. 2012

[9]The strategy and potential utilization of temperate germplasm for tropical germplasm improvement: a case study of maize (Zea mays L.). Wen, Weiwei,Tovar, Victor H. Chavez,Taba, Suketoshi,Wen, Weiwei,Yan, Jianbing,Guo, Tingting,Li, Huihui. 2012

[10]Genomic Predictions Combining Snp Markers A.nd Copy Number Variations I n Nellore Cattle. Hay, EA, Utsunomiya, YT, Xu, LY, Zhou, Y, Neves, HHR, Carvalheiro, R, Bickhart, DM, Ma, L, Garcia, JF, Liu, GE. 2018

[11]Genetic dissection of and genomic selection for seed weight, pod length, and pod width in soybean. Chen, Yijie,Xiong, Yajun,Hong, Huilong,Li, Gang,Gao, Jie,Guo, Qingyuan,Sun, Rujian,Ren, Honglei,Zhang, Fan,Wang, Jun,Song, Jian,Qiu, Lijuan. 2023

[12]Assessment the effect of genomic selection and detection of selective signature in broilers. Xiaodong Tan,Ranran Liu,Wei Li,Maiqing Zheng,Dan Zhu,Dawei Liu,Furong Feng,Qinghe Li,Li Liu,Jie Wen,Guiping Zhao. 2022

[13]Accuracy of genomic selection for alfalfa biomass yield in two full-sib populations. Xiaofan He,Fan Zhang,Fei He,Yuhua Shen,Long Xi Yu,Tiejun Zhang,Junmei Kang. 2022

[14]Editorial: Soybean molecular breeding and genetics. Guo Liang Jiang,Istvan Rajcan,Yuan Ming Zhang,Tianfu Han,Rouf Mian. 2023

[15]Comparative functional analysis of macrophage phagocytosis in Dagu chickens and Wenchang chickens. Jin Zhang,Qiao Wang,Qinghe Li,Zixuan Wang,Maiqing Zheng,Jie Wen,Guiping Zhao. 2023

[16]Genomic selection to introgress exotic maize germplasm into elite maize in China to improve kernel dehydration rate. Hongjun Yong,Nan Wang,Xiaojun Yang,Fengyi Zhang,Juan Tang,Zhiyuan Yang,Xinzhe Zhao,Yi Li,Mingshun Li,Degui Zhang,Zhuanfang Hao,Jianfeng Weng,Jienan Han,Huihui Li,Xinhai Li. 2021

[17]SoySNP618K array: A high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism platform as a valuable genomic resource for soybean genetics and breeding. Yan Fei Li,Ying Hui Li,Shan Shan Su,Jochen C. Reif,Zhao Ming Qi,Xiao Bo Wang,Xing Wang,Yu Tian,De Lin Li,Ru Jian Sun,Zhang Xiong Liu,Ze Jun Xu,Guang Hui Fu,Ya Liang Ji,Qing Shan Chen,Ji Qiang Liu,Li Juan Qiu. 2022

[18]Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China. Wei, Xia,Zhang, Tian,Wang, Ligang,Zhang, Longchao,Hou, Xinhua,Yan, Hua,Wang, Lixian. 2022

[19]Enhancing genetic gain through genomic selection: from livestock to plants. Yunbi Xu*,Xiaogang Liu,Junjie Fu,Hongwu Wang,Jiankang Wang,Changling Wang,Boddupalli M. Prasanna,Michael S. Olsen,Guoying Wang,Aimin Zhang. 2020

[20]QTL mapping and genomic selection for Fusarium ear rot resistance using two F-2:3 populations in maize. Guo, Zifeng,Wang, Shanhong,Li, Wen-Xue,Liu, Jiacheng,Guo, Wei,Xu, Mingliang,Xu, Yunbi. 2022

作者其他论文 更多>>