数字农科院2.0

Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Beef Cattle Using WMGBLUP and SNP Pre-Selection

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Zhao, Huqiong;Xie, Xueyuan;Ma, Haoran;Zhou, Peinuo;Xu, Boran;Zhang, Yuanqing;Xu, Lingyang;Gao, Huijiang;Li, Junya;Wang, Zezhao;Niu, Xiaoyan

作者机构：

关键词： GWAS;beef cattle;multi-population genomic prediction;simulation

期刊名称： AGRICULTURE-BASEL

ISSN：

年卷期： 2025 年 15 卷 10 期

页码：

收录情况： SCIE（2025版）

摘要： Genomic selection (GS) plays a crucial role in livestock breeding. However, its implementation in Chinese beef cattle breeding is constrained by a limited reference population and incomplete data records. To address these challenges, this study aimed to identify more effective models for multi-population genomic selection. We simulated five different beef cattle populations and selected three populations with varying levels of kinship to investigate the impact of population relationships on genomic prediction. Utilizing results from a genome-wide association study (GWAS), we preselected different proportions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Subsequently, we employed three models-genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), multi-genomic best linear unbiased prediction (MGBLUP), and weighted multi-genomic best linear unbiased prediction (WMGBLUP)-for within-population and multi-population genomic prediction. Our results showed that increasing the size of the training set improved within-population prediction accuracy. Furthermore, both MGBLUP and WMGBLUP outperformed GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy for both within-population and multi-population analyses. Among the models evaluated, the WMGBLUP model, which utilized the top 5% of preselected SNPs based on GWAS findings, demonstrated superior performance, yielding an improvement of up to 11.1% in within-population prediction and 16.5% in multi-population prediction. In summary, both WMGBLUP and MGBLUP models exhibit enhanced efficacy in improving genomic prediction accuracy, and the incorporation of GWAS results can further optimize their performance.

分类号：

  • 相关文献

[1]Cis-eQTL Analysis and Functional Validation of Candidate Genes for Carcass Yield Traits in Beef Cattle. Tianzhen Wang,Qunhao Niu,Tianliu Zhang,Xu Zheng,Haipeng Li,Xue Gao,Yan Chen,Huijiang Gao,Lupei Zhang,George E. Liu,Junya Li,Lingyang Xu. 2022

[2]Integrated analyses of genomic and transcriptomic data reveal candidate variants associated with carcass traits in Huaxi cattle. Yapeng Zhang,Wentao Cai,Qi Zhang,Qian Li,Yahui Wang,Ruiqi Peng,Haiqi Yin,Xin Hu,Zezhao Wang,Bo Zhu,Xue Gao,Yan Chen,Huijiang Gao,Lingyang Xu,Junya Li,Lupei Zhang. 2025

[3]蛋鸡资源群体的盲肠长度全基因组关联分析. 王星果,曲亮,卢建,窦套存,马猛,胡玉萍,沈曼曼,郭军,李尚民,王克华. 2018

[4]中国籼稻群体的遗传结构解析及12个株型性状的全基因组关联分析. 鲁清,章孟臣,魏兴华. 2015

[5]北京油鸡血清IgG含量的GWAS初步分析. 张磊,刘冉冉,赵桂苹,文杰,郑麦青,吴丹,胡耀东,李鹏,刘丽. 2011

[6]黄瓜发芽期耐热性评价及全基因组关联分析. 张松,苗晗,宋子超,薄凯亮,王烨,顾兴芳,张圣平. 2019

[7]功能基因筛选方法的研究进展. 姚雅馨,喇永富,汤继顺,贺小云,张壮彪,储明星. 2020

[8]玉米叶片叶绿素含量的全基因组关联性分析. 滕守振1,,2 汪海2 梁海生1,,2 辛红佳2 李圣彦2 郎志宏2. 2017

[9]基于通路分析方法诠释肉鸡体重性状全基因组关联研究. 王杰,刘璐,刘杰,赵桂苹,刘冉冉,郑麦青,文杰. 2017

[10]黄瓜核心种质幼苗耐低温性评价及GWAS分析. 王伟平,宋子超,薄凯亮,董邵云,魏爽,苗晗,李锦斌,张圣平,顾兴芳. 2019

[11]黄瓜核心种质幼苗耐热性评价及GWAS分析. 魏爽,张松,薄凯亮,王伟平,苗晗,董邵云,顾兴芳,张圣平. 2019

[12]利用两种统计模型对中国肉用西门塔尔牛屠宰性状的全基因组关联分析. 常天鹏,夏江威,宝金山,金生云,朱波,徐凌洋,陈燕,张路培,高雪,李俊雅,高会江. 2018

[13]基于SNP标记的小麦籽粒性状全基因组关联分析. 张芳,任毅,曹俊梅,李法计,夏先春,耿洪伟. 2021

[14]小麦芒基因定位及其与农艺性状的相关性分析. 李玲,刘盼,张蕾,张浩,贾继增,高丽锋. 2021

[15]桃花花型（铃形/蔷薇形）基因型鉴定、分子标记开发与利用. 吉爽秋,王力荣,李勇,朱更瑞,曹珂,方伟超,陈昌文,王新卫,张琦,吴金龙. 2022

[16]油菜籽脂肪组成的遗传结构剖析. 杨雨婷,于文凯,徐颖,王会,梅德圣,蒋立希,胡琼,刘佳. 2022

[17]基于GWAS和BSA-seq挖掘辣椒果实中辣椒红色素含量的QTL区间及候选基因. 班国梁,曹亚从,张正海,于海龙,吴华茂,李戎轩,赵红,张伟丽,聂智星,宋红霞,王立浩. 2025

[18]基于MAGIC群体的烟草抗黑胫病全基因组关联分析. 潘怡,刘洪泰,吉白璐,王红,黄立钰,程立锐. 2024

[19]低磷胁迫下大豆苗期根系性状全基因组关联分析. 孙畅,刘美玲,刘子君,杨光,梁腾月,周宣汝,赵悦如,张洛桐,谷勇哲,敖雪. 2024

[20]基于无人机高通量作物表型技术研究进展（英文）. 张家欣,余世浩,牛牧远,叶育璐,徐新阳,王远,郭三堆,Rashid Bushra,梁成真,孟志刚. 2025

作者其他论文 更多>>