数字农科院2.0

A comparative study on in vitro and in vivo stomach-small intestinal and large intestinal digestion of plant protein meals in growing pigs

文献类型: 外文期刊

作者: Du, Zhongyuan;Gao, Lixiang;Wang, Yuming;Xie, Jingjing;Zeng, Shuli;Zhao, Jiangtao;Sa, Renna;Zhao, Feng

作者机构:

关键词: in vitro digestion;large intestine;pig;plant protein meals;stomach-small intestine

期刊名称: JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE

ISSN: 0021-8812

年卷期: 2023 年 101 卷

页码:

收录情况: SCIE(2023版)

摘要: The computer-controlled simulated stomach-small intestinal digestibility was greater than that of the corresponding in vivo values, resulting in less digestible substrates hydrolyzed by in vitro large intestinal fluid, whereas more digestible substrates can be digested by in vivo large intestine in plant protein meals, indicating it is necessary to optimize in vitro stomach-small intestinal digestion time. This experiment evaluated the difference between computer-controlled simulated digestion and in vivo stomach-small intestinal or large intestinal digestion for growing pigs. Five diets including a corn-soybean meal basal diet and four experimental diets with rapeseed meal (RSM), cottonseed meal (CSM), sunflower meal (SFM), or peanut meal (PNM) were assigned to each group of five barrows installed terminal ileal cannula or distal cecal cannula in a 5 x 5 Latin square design. Ileal digesta and feces were collected for the determination of digestibility of dry matter (DM) and gross energy (GE) as well as digestible energy (DE) at terminal ileum and total tract. The large intestinal digestibility and DE were calculated by the difference between measurements obtained at the terminal ileum and those obtained from total tract. In vitro stomach-small intestinal digestibility and DE for diets and plant protein meals were determined by stomach-small intestinal digestion in a computer-controlled simulated digestion system (CCSDS). The in vitro large intestinal digestibility and DE of diets were determined in a CCSDS using ileal digesta and enzymes extracted from cecal digesta of pigs. The in vitro large intestinal digestibility and DE of four plant protein meals were determined by the difference between stomach-small intestinal and total tract digestion in the CCSDS. For the experimental diets, the in vitro ileal digestibility and DE were not different from corresponding in vivo values in basal diet and PNM diet, but greater than corresponding in vivo values for diets with RSM, CSM, and SFM (P < 0.05). No difference was observed between in vitro and in vivo large intestinal digestibility and DE in five diets. For the feed ingredients, the in vitro ileal digestibility and DE did not differ from corresponding in vivo ileal values in RSM and PNM but were greater than the in vivo ileal values in CSM and SFM (P < 0.05). The in vitro large intestinal GE digestibility and DE were not different from in vivo large intestinal values in RSM, CSM, and PNM, but lower than in vivo large intestinal values in SFM. This finding may relate to the higher fiber content of plant protein meals resulting in shorter digestion time of in vivo stomach-small intestine thus lower digestibility compared to in vitro, indicating it is necessary to optimize in vitro stomach-small intestinal digestion time. Lay Summary Comparable in vitro and in vivo values are crucial to develop a novel in vitro digestion technique for growing pigs. The current study evaluated the difference between computer-controlled simulated digestion and in vivo stomach-small intestinal or large intestinal digestion for growing pigs. Five diets including a corn-soybean meal basal diet and four experimental diets with rapeseed meal (RSM), cottonseed meal (CSM), sunflower meal (SFM), or peanut meal (PNM) were used to compare the in vitro and in vivo digestion. Our study demonstrated that the in vitro ileal digestibility of energy was not different from corresponding in vivo values in basal diet and PNM diet, but greater than corresponding in vivo values for diets with RSM, CSM, and SFM. The in vitro stomach-small intestinal digestibility was greater than in vivo digestibility, resulting in less digestible substrates hydrolyzed by in vitro large intestinal fluid, whereas more digestible substrates can be digested by in vivo large intestine in plant protein meals. This difference may relate to the higher fiber content of plant protein meals resulting in shorter digestion time of in vivo stomach-small intestine thus lower digestibility compared to in vitro. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize in vitro stomach-small intestinal digestion time.

分类号:

  • 相关文献

[1]Increasing carbohydrates or nitrogenous compounds by cecal infusion leads to an opposite influence on colonic microbiota and host metabolism in a pig model. Yu Pi,Chunlong Mu,Kan Gao,Zhuang Liu,Yu Peng,Kaifan Yu,Yong Su,Weiyun Zhu. 2025

[2]Changes in physicochemical and biological properties of polyphenolic-protein-polysaccharide ternary complexes from hovenia dulcis after in vitro simulated saliva-gastrointestinal digestion. Ding Tao Wu,Yuan He,Meng Xi Fu,Ren You Gan,Yi Chen Hu,Liang Zou. 2021

[3]Effect of Encapsulation Material on Lipid Bioaccessibility and Oxidation during In Vitro Digestion of Black Seed Oil. Alberdi-Cedeño J.,Aichner M.,Mistlberger-Reiner A.,Shi A.,Pignitter M.. 2023

[4]Storage temperature and time affect the enzyme resistance starch and glycemic response of cooked noodles. Yu Tian,Ming Li,Xingxun Liu,Jay-lin Jane,Boli Guo,Sushil Dhital. 2021

[5]Inhibition of phenolics on the in vitro digestion of noodles from the view of phenolics release. Wang, Ruibin,Li, Ming,Wu, Gang,Hui, Xiaodan,Tu, Juncai,Brennan, Margaret A.,Guo, Boli,Brennan, Charles S.. 2021

[6]Pickering Emulsion Stabilized by Tea Seed Cake Protein Nanoparticles as Lutein Carrier. Li Liang,Junlong Zhu,Zhiyi Zhang,Yu Liu,Chaoting Wen,Xiaofang Liu,Jixian Zhang,Youdong Li,Ruijie Liu,Jiaoyan Ren,Qianchun Deng,Guoyan Liu,Xin Xu. 2022

[7]In vitro release and in vivo growth-promoting effects of coated cysteamine in broilers. Liu Y.,Zhao B.,Feng Y.,Zhang H.,Zhang Q.,Hou J.,Wang Y.,Sa R.,Zhao F.,Xie J.. 2023

[8]Exploring Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Chitosan and Multiple Seaweed Polyphenols for an Efficient Protection and Delivery of β-Carotene. Meng, Weihao,Sun, Hongnan,Mu, Tai-Hua,Garcia-Vaquero, Marco. 2024

[9]Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with royal jelly: Characterization, antioxidant, antibacterial activities and in vitro digestion. Jiali Tao,Yanxiang Bi,Shiye Luo,Shenyuan Quan,Jiaxin He,Pingping Dong,Wenli Tian,Xiaoming Fang. 2024

[10]Editorial: In vitro digestion and health benefits of ingredients in plant-based foods. Liang Zou,Peiyou Qin. 2023

[11]A comprehensive analysis of edible and processing quality changes in three whole grain flours induced by dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric cold plasma treatment. Zhu, Yingying,Feng, Xuewei,Zhang, Jinna,Shen, Ruiling,Yao, Yang. 2024

[12]Plant-based proteins: advances in their sources, digestive profiles in vitro and potential health benefits. Li, Mengzhuo,Zou, Liang,Zhang, Lizhen,Ren, Guixing,Liu, Yang,Zhao, Xiaoyan,Qin, Peiyou. 2024

[13]Phenolic composition of Hemerocallis citrina borani and enhancement of release and antioxidant efficacy through an emulsion-based delivery system during in vitro digestion. Yuwen Mu,Jing Sun,Weiye Cui,Xuexi Wang,Jianbin Yang,Bei Fan,Miao Hu,Shenghai Hu,Fengzhong Wang. 2024

[14]Effect of four highland barley proteins on the retrogradation and in vitro digestion properties of highland barley starch. Jiaxin Li,Ran Lin,Mengzi Nie,Aixia Wang,Xue Gong,Lili Wang,Liya Liu,Bin Dang,Xijuan Yang,Fengzhong Wang,Li Tao Tong. 2024

[15]Effect of different food matrices on the bioaccessibility of vitamin D3 in beverage systems: Comparison between juice and liquid milk. Shaojie Fu,Jinfeng Bi,Xiyu Jiang,Meng Liu,Xuan Liu. 2024

[16]Comparison of antioxidant properties of dried and fresh daylily flowers and their impact on lipid and protein oxidation during cooking and in vitro digestion of mutton. Yucan Wu,Lihan Cha,Dong Han,Qiang Xie,Xiaobing Liu,Chunhui Zhang,Jing Wang,Feng Huang. 2025

[17]In vitro digestive properties and the bioactive effect of walnut green husk on human gut microbiota. Xiaolan Zhao,Jiabao Ying,Zhuochen Wang,Yulu Wang,Zhen Li,Tianyi Gu,Shujun Liu,Yulong Li,Bing Liu,Fengjiao Xin,Boting Wen. 2024

[18]Highly cost-effective wheat starch-stearic acid complexes enabled by microwave processing: Structural properties, anti-digestion, and molecular dynamics simulation. Gao, Tingting,Sun, Da-Wen,Tian, You,Ma, Ji,Pan, Fei. 2024

[19]The interaction between banana polyphenols and starch improves the bioavailability of polyphenols after non-co-heating complexation. Yajuan Qin,Jingfeng Ran,Xiaoai Chen,Xuan Zhang,Yutong Zhang,Fei Xu,Kexue Zhu,Cuiping Yi,Yanjun Zhang. 2025

[20]Construction of gastric-stable emulsions based on corn components: Impact of interfacial rheological properties on the dynamic bioaccessibility of lutein. Yanqi Wang,Yuying Chen,Siyue Zhu,Qiaoru Dong,Ting Liu,Qingrong Huang,Jinkai Zheng. 2025

作者其他论文 更多>>